<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Photoshop vs. Photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdharrison.com/2008/06/no-photoshop-vs-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdharrison.com/2008/06/no-photoshop-vs-photoshop/</link>
	<description>This is the personal site/blog/experiment of Chris Harrison, a web designer living, working and playing in Augusta, GA.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrison</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2008/06/no-photoshop-vs-photoshop/#comment-11411</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/?p=1518#comment-11411</guid>
		<description>For me, it's easier just to do it in Photoshop simply because if/when I'm ready to build the design out, I can easily isolate and then slice up the different elements that I'll then use in the build-out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Building sites in Illustrator seems foreign to me. I have no problem using it for logo design or illustrations... but seeing as Photoshop supports Smart Objects and vector shapes and whatnot... I tend to do most of my design work there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To each his own though, right? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, it&#8217;s easier just to do it in Photoshop simply because if/when I&#8217;m ready to build the design out, I can easily isolate and then slice up the different elements that I&#8217;ll then use in the build-out.</p>
<p>Building sites in Illustrator seems foreign to me. I have no problem using it for logo design or illustrations&#8230; but seeing as Photoshop supports Smart Objects and vector shapes and whatnot&#8230; I tend to do most of my design work there.</p>
<p>To each his own though, right? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antgoo</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2008/06/no-photoshop-vs-photoshop/#comment-11410</link>
		<dc:creator>antgoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/?p=1518#comment-11410</guid>
		<description>I've been known to build sites both ways. Ultimately it depends on the level of visual complexity the client wants.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funnily, I've actually taken to designing sites in Illustrator, because I'm a lot more proficient with that program than I am with Photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been known to build sites both ways. Ultimately it depends on the level of visual complexity the client wants.</p>
<p>Funnily, I&#8217;ve actually taken to designing sites in Illustrator, because I&#8217;m a lot more proficient with that program than I am with Photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
