<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have I mentioned I hate Outlook 2007?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/</link>
	<description>This is the personal site/blog/experiment of Chris Harrison, a web designer living, working and playing in Augusta, GA.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: abqaussie</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11008</link>
		<dc:creator>abqaussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11008</guid>
		<description>Aaron - I referenced the hardware I was running in both my previous posts. Two separate machines both with horrible performance issues only in 2007 that were not visible in 2003. 3ghz P4 (I neglected to mention 2GB of RAM on that machine) and my current Dual core 2.4GHZ, 2 GB of RAM.

I can work with manipulations on 20MB images in Photoshop more quickly and efficiently than I can performa basic email tasks. It's not the hardware.

With a product that doesn't have flaws we should be seeing one person who's having problems among dozens for whom the app works flawlessly, not the other way around. 

Telling people to use Thunderbird is missing the point - why can MS not deliver a product that works for a large part of their market, corporate or otherwise, better than a free app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron - I referenced the hardware I was running in both my previous posts. Two separate machines both with horrible performance issues only in 2007 that were not visible in 2003. 3ghz P4 (I neglected to mention 2GB of RAM on that machine) and my current Dual core 2.4GHZ, 2 GB of RAM.</p>
<p>I can work with manipulations on 20MB images in Photoshop more quickly and efficiently than I can performa basic email tasks. It&#8217;s not the hardware.</p>
<p>With a product that doesn&#8217;t have flaws we should be seeing one person who&#8217;s having problems among dozens for whom the app works flawlessly, not the other way around. </p>
<p>Telling people to use Thunderbird is missing the point - why can MS not deliver a product that works for a large part of their market, corporate or otherwise, better than a free app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11007</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11007</guid>
		<description>Aaron, I'd imagine you're in the minority. I was happy with Outlook 2007 when it worked, but when it didn't it was simply unacceptable for me. I'm glad it works for you and your setup. It didn't work for me and it hasn't worked that well for countless others.

(For the record, I was using it on machine with a 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 HT with 3Gb RAM and a 256Mb video card.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, I&#8217;d imagine you&#8217;re in the minority. I was happy with Outlook 2007 when it worked, but when it didn&#8217;t it was simply unacceptable for me. I&#8217;m glad it works for you and your setup. It didn&#8217;t work for me and it hasn&#8217;t worked that well for countless others.</p>
<p>(For the record, I was using it on machine with a 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 HT with 3Gb RAM and a 256Mb video card.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abqaussie</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11359</link>
		<dc:creator>abqaussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11359</guid>
		<description>Aaron - I referenced the hardware I was running in both my previous posts. Two separate machines both with horrible performance issues only in 2007 that were not visible in 2003. 3ghz P4 (I neglected to mention 2GB of RAM on that machine) and my current Dual core 2.4GHZ, 2 GB of RAM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can work with manipulations on 20MB images in Photoshop more quickly and efficiently than I can performa basic email tasks. It's not the hardware.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With a product that doesn't have flaws we should be seeing one person who's having problems among dozens for whom the app works flawlessly, not the other way around. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Telling people to use Thunderbird is missing the point - why can MS not deliver a product that works for a large part of their market, corporate or otherwise, better than a free app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron - I referenced the hardware I was running in both my previous posts. Two separate machines both with horrible performance issues only in 2007 that were not visible in 2003. 3ghz P4 (I neglected to mention 2GB of RAM on that machine) and my current Dual core 2.4GHZ, 2 GB of RAM.</p>
<p>I can work with manipulations on 20MB images in Photoshop more quickly and efficiently than I can performa basic email tasks. It&#8217;s not the hardware.</p>
<p>With a product that doesn&#8217;t have flaws we should be seeing one person who&#8217;s having problems among dozens for whom the app works flawlessly, not the other way around. </p>
<p>Telling people to use Thunderbird is missing the point - why can MS not deliver a product that works for a large part of their market, corporate or otherwise, better than a free app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11358</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11358</guid>
		<description>Aaron, I'd imagine you're in the minority. I was happy with Outlook 2007 when it worked, but when it didn't it was simply unacceptable for me. I'm glad it works for you and your setup. It didn't work for me and it hasn't worked that well for countless others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(For the record, I was using it on machine with a 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 HT with 3Gb RAM and a 256Mb video card.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, I&#8217;d imagine you&#8217;re in the minority. I was happy with Outlook 2007 when it worked, but when it didn&#8217;t it was simply unacceptable for me. I&#8217;m glad it works for you and your setup. It didn&#8217;t work for me and it hasn&#8217;t worked that well for countless others.</p>
<p>(For the record, I was using it on machine with a 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 HT with 3Gb RAM and a 256Mb video card.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11005</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11005</guid>
		<description>I'm going to go the other direction and say that I LOVE outlook and office 2007.

I doubt I'll have DST problems as I don't sync anything with online calendars, so when DST comes around, I'll be happy the times are updated.

Performance wise, this runs great. There was no performance drop in 2003 in the slightest. There has been no data corruption, no long loading times, no massive CPU or disk usage at all. I watched my CPU usage while running it and playing with the calendar, mail, etc. The highest jump I saw was 8% with an average of 2%, and most of that is probably system and background apps! Someone else was complaining about clicking links and having them open in a browser taking 30 seconds. In actuality, it so quick it's almost instant. If the browser isn't running currently, then yes, it takes approximately 0.5 seconds. You must be running on a 200 MHz Celeron or something. My machine is ok, a core 2 duo @ 2.4 GHz with 4 GB of ram, nothing too high end or special.

As for internet calendars, who cares. It's called Exchange server, and it works like a charm. If you're wanting email in a non-corporate setting, use something like Thunderbird. That's what I use at home, and I love it.

Otherwise, I love Outlook 07. Overlaying calendars on top of each other is a great feature, and the calendar views seem cleaner to me. Tasks are much more improved, especially how they line up in your calendar view so everything is integrated together. The built in viewers for office docs, text, and images right within messages are great.

I honestly have not run into a single issue after upgrading Office to 07, and will never go back. It's an update well worth doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to go the other direction and say that I LOVE outlook and office 2007.</p>
<p>I doubt I&#8217;ll have DST problems as I don&#8217;t sync anything with online calendars, so when DST comes around, I&#8217;ll be happy the times are updated.</p>
<p>Performance wise, this runs great. There was no performance drop in 2003 in the slightest. There has been no data corruption, no long loading times, no massive CPU or disk usage at all. I watched my CPU usage while running it and playing with the calendar, mail, etc. The highest jump I saw was 8% with an average of 2%, and most of that is probably system and background apps! Someone else was complaining about clicking links and having them open in a browser taking 30 seconds. In actuality, it so quick it&#8217;s almost instant. If the browser isn&#8217;t running currently, then yes, it takes approximately 0.5 seconds. You must be running on a 200 MHz Celeron or something. My machine is ok, a core 2 duo @ 2.4 GHz with 4 GB of ram, nothing too high end or special.</p>
<p>As for internet calendars, who cares. It&#8217;s called Exchange server, and it works like a charm. If you&#8217;re wanting email in a non-corporate setting, use something like Thunderbird. That&#8217;s what I use at home, and I love it.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I love Outlook 07. Overlaying calendars on top of each other is a great feature, and the calendar views seem cleaner to me. Tasks are much more improved, especially how they line up in your calendar view so everything is integrated together. The built in viewers for office docs, text, and images right within messages are great.</p>
<p>I honestly have not run into a single issue after upgrading Office to 07, and will never go back. It&#8217;s an update well worth doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11357</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11357</guid>
		<description>I'm going to go the other direction and say that I LOVE outlook and office 2007.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I doubt I'll have DST problems as I don't sync anything with online calendars, so when DST comes around, I'll be happy the times are updated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Performance wise, this runs great. There was no performance drop in 2003 in the slightest. There has been no data corruption, no long loading times, no massive CPU or disk usage at all. I watched my CPU usage while running it and playing with the calendar, mail, etc. The highest jump I saw was 8% with an average of 2%, and most of that is probably system and background apps! Someone else was complaining about clicking links and having them open in a browser taking 30 seconds. In actuality, it so quick it's almost instant. If the browser isn't running currently, then yes, it takes approximately 0.5 seconds. You must be running on a 200 MHz Celeron or something. My machine is ok, a core 2 duo @ 2.4 GHz with 4 GB of ram, nothing too high end or special.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for internet calendars, who cares. It's called Exchange server, and it works like a charm. If you're wanting email in a non-corporate setting, use something like Thunderbird. That's what I use at home, and I love it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Otherwise, I love Outlook 07. Overlaying calendars on top of each other is a great feature, and the calendar views seem cleaner to me. Tasks are much more improved, especially how they line up in your calendar view so everything is integrated together. The built in viewers for office docs, text, and images right within messages are great.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I honestly have not run into a single issue after upgrading Office to 07, and will never go back. It's an update well worth doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to go the other direction and say that I LOVE outlook and office 2007.</p>
<p>I doubt I&#8217;ll have DST problems as I don&#8217;t sync anything with online calendars, so when DST comes around, I&#8217;ll be happy the times are updated.</p>
<p>Performance wise, this runs great. There was no performance drop in 2003 in the slightest. There has been no data corruption, no long loading times, no massive CPU or disk usage at all. I watched my CPU usage while running it and playing with the calendar, mail, etc. The highest jump I saw was 8% with an average of 2%, and most of that is probably system and background apps! Someone else was complaining about clicking links and having them open in a browser taking 30 seconds. In actuality, it so quick it&#8217;s almost instant. If the browser isn&#8217;t running currently, then yes, it takes approximately 0.5 seconds. You must be running on a 200 MHz Celeron or something. My machine is ok, a core 2 duo @ 2.4 GHz with 4 GB of ram, nothing too high end or special.</p>
<p>As for internet calendars, who cares. It&#8217;s called Exchange server, and it works like a charm. If you&#8217;re wanting email in a non-corporate setting, use something like Thunderbird. That&#8217;s what I use at home, and I love it.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I love Outlook 07. Overlaying calendars on top of each other is a great feature, and the calendar views seem cleaner to me. Tasks are much more improved, especially how they line up in your calendar view so everything is integrated together. The built in viewers for office docs, text, and images right within messages are great.</p>
<p>I honestly have not run into a single issue after upgrading Office to 07, and will never go back. It&#8217;s an update well worth doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10955</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10955</guid>
		<description>The auto-formatting is the absolute worst. It was bad in OL03, but has now gone to a whole new level of invasiveness. 

Some very basic things have been shuffled about and recategorized and what once took 1 click now takes 3. And so on and so forth.

It's called QA microsoft, you might want to investigate some best practices.

It is quite the swine on resources as well.

Downgrade time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The auto-formatting is the absolute worst. It was bad in OL03, but has now gone to a whole new level of invasiveness. </p>
<p>Some very basic things have been shuffled about and recategorized and what once took 1 click now takes 3. And so on and so forth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called QA microsoft, you might want to investigate some best practices.</p>
<p>It is quite the swine on resources as well.</p>
<p>Downgrade time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11356</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11356</guid>
		<description>The auto-formatting is the absolute worst. It was bad in OL03, but has now gone to a whole new level of invasiveness. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some very basic things have been shuffled about and recategorized and what once took 1 click now takes 3. And so on and so forth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's called QA microsoft, you might want to investigate some best practices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is quite the swine on resources as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Downgrade time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The auto-formatting is the absolute worst. It was bad in OL03, but has now gone to a whole new level of invasiveness. </p>
<p>Some very basic things have been shuffled about and recategorized and what once took 1 click now takes 3. And so on and so forth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called QA microsoft, you might want to investigate some best practices.</p>
<p>It is quite the swine on resources as well.</p>
<p>Downgrade time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKR</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10916</link>
		<dc:creator>CKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10916</guid>
		<description>I HATE OUTLOOK 2007--I am not a techie, sorry.  But, all the e-mails I send are blank and all the e-mails I receive are blank.  Sometimes, clicking on REPLY will open them.

Also, the stupid paragraph mark and proofreading characters appear when I am composing an e-mail.  Yes, I have it turned off in Word, Style, toolbar, etc.  It keeps coming back and this program will change styles on me and revert to displaying it.

It is running on XP.  There were no problems for four months then, it started.  Our ISP put everyone they serve into a group at Google mail.  Maybe there is a different way to configure our set up because of that.

I send out a news letter each month, in HTML, and people can't see it.  If anyone has any ideas, they would be welcome.  Setting up a new profile was impossible because of loosing all my contacts.  I am not enough of a techie to reconfigure (and I shouldn't have to) my contacts, etc. after changing profiles.

While I am at it.  Why doesn't Microsoft have updated directions.  If you are looking for direction in Outlook 2007 there is a step that is skipped or the function is called by another name.  That burns me up.  If I pay for Microsoft 2007, I want the directions to be for it not another program!

Thanks, I feel better but, my problems are not solved.  Waiting for the other shoe to drop......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HATE OUTLOOK 2007&#8211;I am not a techie, sorry.  But, all the e-mails I send are blank and all the e-mails I receive are blank.  Sometimes, clicking on REPLY will open them.</p>
<p>Also, the stupid paragraph mark and proofreading characters appear when I am composing an e-mail.  Yes, I have it turned off in Word, Style, toolbar, etc.  It keeps coming back and this program will change styles on me and revert to displaying it.</p>
<p>It is running on XP.  There were no problems for four months then, it started.  Our ISP put everyone they serve into a group at Google mail.  Maybe there is a different way to configure our set up because of that.</p>
<p>I send out a news letter each month, in HTML, and people can&#8217;t see it.  If anyone has any ideas, they would be welcome.  Setting up a new profile was impossible because of loosing all my contacts.  I am not enough of a techie to reconfigure (and I shouldn&#8217;t have to) my contacts, etc. after changing profiles.</p>
<p>While I am at it.  Why doesn&#8217;t Microsoft have updated directions.  If you are looking for direction in Outlook 2007 there is a step that is skipped or the function is called by another name.  That burns me up.  If I pay for Microsoft 2007, I want the directions to be for it not another program!</p>
<p>Thanks, I feel better but, my problems are not solved.  Waiting for the other shoe to drop&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKR</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11355</link>
		<dc:creator>CKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11355</guid>
		<description>I HATE OUTLOOK 2007--I am not a techie, sorry.  But, all the e-mails I send are blank and all the e-mails I receive are blank.  Sometimes, clicking on REPLY will open them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, the stupid paragraph mark and proofreading characters appear when I am composing an e-mail.  Yes, I have it turned off in Word, Style, toolbar, etc.  It keeps coming back and this program will change styles on me and revert to displaying it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is running on XP.  There were no problems for four months then, it started.  Our ISP put everyone they serve into a group at Google mail.  Maybe there is a different way to configure our set up because of that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I send out a news letter each month, in HTML, and people can't see it.  If anyone has any ideas, they would be welcome.  Setting up a new profile was impossible because of loosing all my contacts.  I am not enough of a techie to reconfigure (and I shouldn't have to) my contacts, etc. after changing profiles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I am at it.  Why doesn't Microsoft have updated directions.  If you are looking for direction in Outlook 2007 there is a step that is skipped or the function is called by another name.  That burns me up.  If I pay for Microsoft 2007, I want the directions to be for it not another program!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, I feel better but, my problems are not solved.  Waiting for the other shoe to drop......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HATE OUTLOOK 2007&#8211;I am not a techie, sorry.  But, all the e-mails I send are blank and all the e-mails I receive are blank.  Sometimes, clicking on REPLY will open them.</p>
<p>Also, the stupid paragraph mark and proofreading characters appear when I am composing an e-mail.  Yes, I have it turned off in Word, Style, toolbar, etc.  It keeps coming back and this program will change styles on me and revert to displaying it.</p>
<p>It is running on XP.  There were no problems for four months then, it started.  Our ISP put everyone they serve into a group at Google mail.  Maybe there is a different way to configure our set up because of that.</p>
<p>I send out a news letter each month, in HTML, and people can&#8217;t see it.  If anyone has any ideas, they would be welcome.  Setting up a new profile was impossible because of loosing all my contacts.  I am not enough of a techie to reconfigure (and I shouldn&#8217;t have to) my contacts, etc. after changing profiles.</p>
<p>While I am at it.  Why doesn&#8217;t Microsoft have updated directions.  If you are looking for direction in Outlook 2007 there is a step that is skipped or the function is called by another name.  That burns me up.  If I pay for Microsoft 2007, I want the directions to be for it not another program!</p>
<p>Thanks, I feel better but, my problems are not solved.  Waiting for the other shoe to drop&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chard</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10909</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10909</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if I should laugh or cry, if I should be happy that there are others out there like me or angry that this is a REAL problem not something made up in my head.  I like microsoft products for the most part but do have to say that I HATE outlook 07.  Every time I go in to edit an event in my calendar it turns it into a repeated event... for no reason!  Oh yeah and it takes 3-4 seconds to recognize the simplest button click!  I'm running vista with 2gigs of ram and I do not have any slow problems with any other program.  I talked to Microsft and they basically said that it's an oem product and to call Dell!  Man I'm pissed!  I'd throw it out the window but I'm not sure what else I can use that'll hook up to my blackjack II!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I should laugh or cry, if I should be happy that there are others out there like me or angry that this is a REAL problem not something made up in my head.  I like microsoft products for the most part but do have to say that I HATE outlook 07.  Every time I go in to edit an event in my calendar it turns it into a repeated event&#8230; for no reason!  Oh yeah and it takes 3-4 seconds to recognize the simplest button click!  I&#8217;m running vista with 2gigs of ram and I do not have any slow problems with any other program.  I talked to Microsft and they basically said that it&#8217;s an oem product and to call Dell!  Man I&#8217;m pissed!  I&#8217;d throw it out the window but I&#8217;m not sure what else I can use that&#8217;ll hook up to my blackjack II!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chard</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11354</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11354</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if I should laugh or cry, if I should be happy that there are others out there like me or angry that this is a REAL problem not something made up in my head.  I like microsoft products for the most part but do have to say that I HATE outlook 07.  Every time I go in to edit an event in my calendar it turns it into a repeated event... for no reason!  Oh yeah and it takes 3-4 seconds to recognize the simplest button click!  I'm running vista with 2gigs of ram and I do not have any slow problems with any other program.  I talked to Microsft and they basically said that it's an oem product and to call Dell!  Man I'm pissed!  I'd throw it out the window but I'm not sure what else I can use that'll hook up to my blackjack II!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I should laugh or cry, if I should be happy that there are others out there like me or angry that this is a REAL problem not something made up in my head.  I like microsoft products for the most part but do have to say that I HATE outlook 07.  Every time I go in to edit an event in my calendar it turns it into a repeated event&#8230; for no reason!  Oh yeah and it takes 3-4 seconds to recognize the simplest button click!  I&#8217;m running vista with 2gigs of ram and I do not have any slow problems with any other program.  I talked to Microsft and they basically said that it&#8217;s an oem product and to call Dell!  Man I&#8217;m pissed!  I&#8217;d throw it out the window but I&#8217;m not sure what else I can use that&#8217;ll hook up to my blackjack II!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blueskyswan</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10764</link>
		<dc:creator>Blueskyswan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-10764</guid>
		<description>I upgraded from Office 2003 to 2007, because I primarily wanted the 2007 version of Powerpoint.  But I'm not enjoying Office 2007.  In Outlook 2007, I cannot save images from emails.  If I right click an image in an email, I only get an option to copy it, no 'save as' option, as there usually is in Outlook 2003.  So I chose to copy the image, it was the only option available, but when I tried to paste that into Irfanview..., bup-bow.  It said no way.  It's ridiculous!  So I've been searching for a solution on the net, and only finding other people with the same complaint, and other people telling them the way Outlook and Word in 2007 work forbids it.  I can't believe it.  I did find one way around it tonight.......  I saved the email with the image I wanted, then chose to open it with Word and the image was successfully displayed.  In Word I was able to successfully right click, copy the image, and then paste it into my Irfanview program, without Irfanview rejecting it.  From THERE I could at long last save the image I wanted to my files as a jpg.  Bloody hell.  What a runaround, everytime I want to save an image.  Sigh.  I have now been investigating getting rid of Office 2007, and going back to 2003, just for the lack of dramas.  I much prefer the user interface of 2003.

Thing is I still want the 2007 version of Powerpoint......   I wanted to do a custom install of Office 2007 originally, installing only Powerpoint, but it wouldn't let me.   So.  Do you think it would be possible, to go to add/remove programs, choose change, and delete everything from Office 2007, BUT for Powerpoint.  Then install Office 2003, choosing to ONLY install Word and Outlook (as that's all i want) from Office 2003, and still end up with my Powerpoint 2007????  I'd appreciate any opinions or feedback about my idea before I go ahead and try it.  I might be just dreamin here, but, it seems to make logical sense to me, lol.
thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded from Office 2003 to 2007, because I primarily wanted the 2007 version of Powerpoint.  But I&#8217;m not enjoying Office 2007.  In Outlook 2007, I cannot save images from emails.  If I right click an image in an email, I only get an option to copy it, no &#8217;save as&#8217; option, as there usually is in Outlook 2003.  So I chose to copy the image, it was the only option available, but when I tried to paste that into Irfanview&#8230;, bup-bow.  It said no way.  It&#8217;s ridiculous!  So I&#8217;ve been searching for a solution on the net, and only finding other people with the same complaint, and other people telling them the way Outlook and Word in 2007 work forbids it.  I can&#8217;t believe it.  I did find one way around it tonight&#8230;&#8230;.  I saved the email with the image I wanted, then chose to open it with Word and the image was successfully displayed.  In Word I was able to successfully right click, copy the image, and then paste it into my Irfanview program, without Irfanview rejecting it.  From THERE I could at long last save the image I wanted to my files as a jpg.  Bloody hell.  What a runaround, everytime I want to save an image.  Sigh.  I have now been investigating getting rid of Office 2007, and going back to 2003, just for the lack of dramas.  I much prefer the user interface of 2003.</p>
<p>Thing is I still want the 2007 version of Powerpoint&#8230;&#8230;   I wanted to do a custom install of Office 2007 originally, installing only Powerpoint, but it wouldn&#8217;t let me.   So.  Do you think it would be possible, to go to add/remove programs, choose change, and delete everything from Office 2007, BUT for Powerpoint.  Then install Office 2003, choosing to ONLY install Word and Outlook (as that&#8217;s all i want) from Office 2003, and still end up with my Powerpoint 2007????  I&#8217;d appreciate any opinions or feedback about my idea before I go ahead and try it.  I might be just dreamin here, but, it seems to make logical sense to me, lol.<br />
thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blueskyswan</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11353</link>
		<dc:creator>Blueskyswan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-11353</guid>
		<description>I upgraded from Office 2003 to 2007, because I primarily wanted the 2007 version of Powerpoint.  But I'm not enjoying Office 2007.  In Outlook 2007, I cannot save images from emails.  If I right click an image in an email, I only get an option to copy it, no 'save as' option, as there usually is in Outlook 2003.  So I chose to copy the image, it was the only option available, but when I tried to paste that into Irfanview..., bup-bow.  It said no way.  It's ridiculous!  So I've been searching for a solution on the net, and only finding other people with the same complaint, and other people telling them the way Outlook and Word in 2007 work forbids it.  I can't believe it.  I did find one way around it tonight.......  I saved the email with the image I wanted, then chose to open it with Word and the image was successfully displayed.  In Word I was able to successfully right click, copy the image, and then paste it into my Irfanview program, without Irfanview rejecting it.  From THERE I could at long last save the image I wanted to my files as a jpg.  Bloody hell.  What a runaround, everytime I want to save an image.  Sigh.  I have now been investigating getting rid of Office 2007, and going back to 2003, just for the lack of dramas.  I much prefer the user interface of 2003.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thing is I still want the 2007 version of Powerpoint......   I wanted to do a custom install of Office 2007 originally, installing only Powerpoint, but it wouldn't let me.   So.  Do you think it would be possible, to go to add/remove programs, choose change, and delete everything from Office 2007, BUT for Powerpoint.  Then install Office 2003, choosing to ONLY install Word and Outlook (as that's all i want) from Office 2003, and still end up with my Powerpoint 2007????  I'd appreciate any opinions or feedback about my idea before I go ahead and try it.  I might be just dreamin here, but, it seems to make logical sense to me, lol.&lt;br&gt;thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded from Office 2003 to 2007, because I primarily wanted the 2007 version of Powerpoint.  But I&#8217;m not enjoying Office 2007.  In Outlook 2007, I cannot save images from emails.  If I right click an image in an email, I only get an option to copy it, no &#8217;save as&#8217; option, as there usually is in Outlook 2003.  So I chose to copy the image, it was the only option available, but when I tried to paste that into Irfanview&#8230;, bup-bow.  It said no way.  It&#8217;s ridiculous!  So I&#8217;ve been searching for a solution on the net, and only finding other people with the same complaint, and other people telling them the way Outlook and Word in 2007 work forbids it.  I can&#8217;t believe it.  I did find one way around it tonight&#8230;&#8230;.  I saved the email with the image I wanted, then chose to open it with Word and the image was successfully displayed.  In Word I was able to successfully right click, copy the image, and then paste it into my Irfanview program, without Irfanview rejecting it.  From THERE I could at long last save the image I wanted to my files as a jpg.  Bloody hell.  What a runaround, everytime I want to save an image.  Sigh.  I have now been investigating getting rid of Office 2007, and going back to 2003, just for the lack of dramas.  I much prefer the user interface of 2003.</p>
<p>Thing is I still want the 2007 version of Powerpoint&#8230;&#8230;   I wanted to do a custom install of Office 2007 originally, installing only Powerpoint, but it wouldn&#8217;t let me.   So.  Do you think it would be possible, to go to add/remove programs, choose change, and delete everything from Office 2007, BUT for Powerpoint.  Then install Office 2003, choosing to ONLY install Word and Outlook (as that&#8217;s all i want) from Office 2003, and still end up with my Powerpoint 2007????  I&#8217;d appreciate any opinions or feedback about my idea before I go ahead and try it.  I might be just dreamin here, but, it seems to make logical sense to me, lol.<br />thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abqaussie</title>
		<link>http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-9528</link>
		<dc:creator>abqaussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 06:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/#comment-9528</guid>
		<description>Almost a year later, new machine. Dual core 2.4GHZ, 2 GB of RAM. Outlook 2007 is still miserable. Horrible. Slow. Buggy. Still has rendering issues within the UI.  

Opening a link from within the app takes 30 seconds. A link. In an email. Which opens a browser. OL2003 on my old PIII 766 at home takes 10 seconds. And it can barely run Windows.

Between Vista and OL2007 I am pretty much ready to switch OSes. 

I bought three new home computers this year. All of them with XP and OL 2003. And I'm perfectly happy. 

Brave new world, where art thou?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost a year later, new machine. Dual core 2.4GHZ, 2 GB of RAM. Outlook 2007 is still miserable. Horrible. Slow. Buggy. Still has rendering issues within the UI.  </p>
<p>Opening a link from within the app takes 30 seconds. A link. In an email. Which opens a browser. OL2003 on my old PIII 766 at home takes 10 seconds. And it can barely run Windows.</p>
<p>Between Vista and OL2007 I am pretty much ready to switch OSes. </p>
<p>I bought three new home computers this year. All of them with XP and OL 2003. And I&#8217;m perfectly happy. </p>
<p>Brave new world, where art thou?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
