Comments on: A Second Look at Outlook 2007 http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/ This is the personal site/blog/experiment of Chris Harrison, a web designer living, working and playing in Augusta, GA. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:22:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: The Lions’ Lab » Office 2007 http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-5456 The Lions’ Lab » Office 2007 Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:07:20 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-5456 [...] friend Chris hasn’t had a lot of positive experience with this latest version [...] [...] friend Chris hasn’t had a lot of positive experience with this latest version [...]

]]> By: Chris Harrison http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-5375 Chris Harrison Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:52:30 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-5375 The idea of a stand-alone calendar is certainly appealing. If I used my Macs more often, I'd probably be using Apple's iCal along with my Google Calendar (perhaps with Spanning Sync helping to keep the two synced up). I'll definitely keep BORG in mind though... Outlook 2007's been having a rash of issues since the DST switch occurred, and I have pretty much sworn off using that abomination of a program for anything but email at this point... The idea of a stand-alone calendar is certainly appealing. If I used my Macs more often, I’d probably be using Apple’s iCal along with my Google Calendar (perhaps with Spanning Sync helping to keep the two synced up). I’ll definitely keep BORG in mind though… Outlook 2007’s been having a rash of issues since the DST switch occurred, and I have pretty much sworn off using that abomination of a program for anything but email at this point…

]]> By: Chris Harrison http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-11514 Chris Harrison Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:52:30 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-11514 The idea of a stand-alone calendar is certainly appealing. If I used my Macs more often, I'd probably be using Apple's iCal along with my Google Calendar (perhaps with Spanning Sync helping to keep the two synced up). I'll definitely keep BORG in mind though... Outlook 2007's been having a rash of issues since the DST switch occurred, and I have pretty much sworn off using that abomination of a program for anything but email at this point... The idea of a stand-alone calendar is certainly appealing. If I used my Macs more often, I’d probably be using Apple’s iCal along with my Google Calendar (perhaps with Spanning Sync helping to keep the two synced up). I’ll definitely keep BORG in mind though… Outlook 2007’s been having a rash of issues since the DST switch occurred, and I have pretty much sworn off using that abomination of a program for anything but email at this point…

]]> By: DavidR http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-5370 DavidR Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:56:12 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-5370 Since you're onto Google Calendar, you might not be interested in this, but I've been finding the cross-platform <a href="http://mbcsoft.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=23&Itemid=38" rel="nofollow">BORG Calendar</a> to suit my needs really well. I don't really want the email-calendar tie in, and I certainly don't want to use Outlook. BORG may not be the prettiest, but ... works! FWIW, YMMV, etc. Since you’re onto Google Calendar, you might not be interested in this, but I’ve been finding the cross-platform BORG Calendar to suit my needs really well. I don’t really want the email-calendar tie in, and I certainly don’t want to use Outlook. BORG may not be the prettiest, but … works!

FWIW, YMMV, etc.

]]> By: DavidR http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-11513 DavidR Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:56:12 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-11513 <a href="http://mbcsoft.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=23&Itemid=38" rel="nofollow">BORG Calendar</a> to suit my needs really well. I don't really want the email-calendar tie in, and I certainly don't want to use Outlook. BORG may not be the prettiest, but ... works!<br><br>FWIW, YMMV, etc. BORG Calendar to suit my needs really well. I don’t really want the email-calendar tie in, and I certainly don’t want to use Outlook. BORG may not be the prettiest, but … works!

FWIW, YMMV, etc.

]]> By: Chris Harrison http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-5261 Chris Harrison Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:18:00 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-5261 It's hovering between 100-140MB... That could be due to my system having 4GB RAM installed and the system's given it a larger allocation of memory... I dunno. To compare, I have had Firefox open almost as long as Outlook and it's using 186MB of memory right now. Adobe Photoshop CS2, which is typically my system's largest memory hog is only using up 14MB of memory. How odd... It’s hovering between 100-140MB… That could be due to my system having 4GB RAM installed and the system’s given it a larger allocation of memory… I dunno. To compare, I have had Firefox open almost as long as Outlook and it’s using 186MB of memory right now.

Adobe Photoshop CS2, which is typically my system’s largest memory hog is only using up 14MB of memory. How odd…

]]> By: Andy Thompson http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-5260 Andy Thompson Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:38:43 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-5260 Does it still use a ton of resources? Then again, it might use less than Thunderbird or Firefox. FF is sitting at 64MB right now. :( Does it still use a ton of resources?

Then again, it might use less than Thunderbird or Firefox. FF is sitting at 64MB right now.

:(

]]> By: Chris Harrison http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-11512 Chris Harrison Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:18:00 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-11512 It's hovering between 100-140MB... That could be due to my system having 4GB RAM installed and the system's given it a larger allocation of memory... I dunno. To compare, I have had Firefox open almost as long as Outlook and it's using 186MB of memory right now.<br><br>Adobe Photoshop CS2, which is typically my system's largest memory hog is only using up 14MB of memory. How odd... It’s hovering between 100-140MB… That could be due to my system having 4GB RAM installed and the system’s given it a larger allocation of memory… I dunno. To compare, I have had Firefox open almost as long as Outlook and it’s using 186MB of memory right now.

Adobe Photoshop CS2, which is typically my system’s largest memory hog is only using up 14MB of memory. How odd…

]]> By: Andy Thompson http://cdharrison.com/2007/02/outlook-2007/#comment-11511 Andy Thompson Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:38:43 +0000 http://cdharrison.com/index.php/2007/02/20/outlook-2007/#comment-11511 Does it still use a ton of resources?<br><br>Then again, it might use less than Thunderbird or Firefox. FF is sitting at 64MB right now.<br><br>:( Does it still use a ton of resources?

Then again, it might use less than Thunderbird or Firefox. FF is sitting at 64MB right now.

:(

]]>