What the heck is going on, you ask? Say hello to Tersus.

Bare bones? You got it. Tersus is an achingly simple WordPress theme without all the usual cruft.

Super Ginormous

This is the personal site/blog/experiment of Chris Harrison, a web designer living, working and playing in Augusta, GA.

|

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007

A Second Look at Outlook 2007

Outlook 2007 Product Box ShotI wrote an “Open Letter to Microsoft” over a month ago. It was a short diatribe on Microsoft’s decision to use Word’s rendering engine for Outlook 2007 instead of Internet Explorer. Well, I had assumed that it would be quite some time before I had to worry about testing designs in Outlook 2007, but that day came much, much sooner than I had anticipated. I snagged a copy of it off of Amazon.com (product link) for $89.99.The interesting thing that I’ve discovered while using the new version, is that where it fails with rendering emails – it excels in handling contacts, calendaring, etc. The mere fact that the new version of Outlook supports the iCal standard, viewing RSS feeds, etc. makes it a pretty solid upgrade. Having said that, I don’t expect you to run out and buy a copy. How it renders email is a huge flaw, and one I have tried hard to ignore while using the product.

CONS

PROS

Aside from the most obvious defect in Outlook 2007, it’s a solid upgrade from Outlook 2003. Hopefully, Microsoft will address the rendering issue at some point – but for now, we’ll have to make due with it the best we can.

This item was posted by Chris Harrison.

Tags:

Categories:

You can follow comments on this item via the RSS 2.0feed.

Comments are closed.

9 comments on “A Second Look at Outlook 2007”

  1. Posted by Andy Thompson on Tuesday, February 20th, 2007.

    Does it still use a ton of resources?

    Then again, it might use less than Thunderbird or Firefox. FF is sitting at 64MB right now.

    :(

  2. Posted by Chris Harrison on Tuesday, February 20th, 2007.

    It’s hovering between 100-140MB… That could be due to my system having 4GB RAM installed and the system’s given it a larger allocation of memory… I dunno. To compare, I have had Firefox open almost as long as Outlook and it’s using 186MB of memory right now.

    Adobe Photoshop CS2, which is typically my system’s largest memory hog is only using up 14MB of memory. How odd…

  3. Posted by Andy Thompson on Tuesday, February 20th, 2007.

    Does it still use a ton of resources?

    Then again, it might use less than Thunderbird or Firefox. FF is sitting at 64MB right now.

    :(

  4. Posted by Chris Harrison on Tuesday, February 20th, 2007.

    It’s hovering between 100-140MB… That could be due to my system having 4GB RAM installed and the system’s given it a larger allocation of memory… I dunno. To compare, I have had Firefox open almost as long as Outlook and it’s using 186MB of memory right now.

    Adobe Photoshop CS2, which is typically my system’s largest memory hog is only using up 14MB of memory. How odd…

  5. Posted by DavidR on Tuesday, March 13th, 2007.

    BORG Calendar to suit my needs really well. I don’t really want the email-calendar tie in, and I certainly don’t want to use Outlook. BORG may not be the prettiest, but … works!

    FWIW, YMMV, etc.

  6. Posted by DavidR on Tuesday, March 13th, 2007.

    Since you’re onto Google Calendar, you might not be interested in this, but I’ve been finding the cross-platform BORG Calendar to suit my needs really well. I don’t really want the email-calendar tie in, and I certainly don’t want to use Outlook. BORG may not be the prettiest, but … works!

    FWIW, YMMV, etc.

  7. Posted by Chris Harrison on Wednesday, March 14th, 2007.

    The idea of a stand-alone calendar is certainly appealing. If I used my Macs more often, I’d probably be using Apple’s iCal along with my Google Calendar (perhaps with Spanning Sync helping to keep the two synced up). I’ll definitely keep BORG in mind though… Outlook 2007′s been having a rash of issues since the DST switch occurred, and I have pretty much sworn off using that abomination of a program for anything but email at this point…

  8. Posted by Chris Harrison on Wednesday, March 14th, 2007.

    The idea of a stand-alone calendar is certainly appealing. If I used my Macs more often, I’d probably be using Apple’s iCal along with my Google Calendar (perhaps with Spanning Sync helping to keep the two synced up). I’ll definitely keep BORG in mind though… Outlook 2007′s been having a rash of issues since the DST switch occurred, and I have pretty much sworn off using that abomination of a program for anything but email at this point…